Hedge Funds Rejected by Top Court on Fannie, Freddie Suits

The justices provided no comment on why they rejected appeals filed by Perry Capital LLC, Fairholme Funds and other Fannie and Freddie shareholders.

(Bloomberg)—The U.S. Supreme Court dealt hedge funds and other big investors a blow Tuesday by refusing to revive core parts of lawsuits that challenged the federal government’s capture of billions of dollars in profits generated by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The justices provided no comment on why they rejected appeals filed by Perry Capital LLC, Fairholme Funds and other Fannie and Freddie shareholders. The rebuff leaves intact a federal appeals court ruling from a year ago that sent Fannie and Freddie shares plunging.

The disputed move, known as the “net-worth sweep,” forced the mortgage guarantors to send almost all their profits to the U.S. Treasury. The companies have been under government control since receiving a taxpayer rescue during the 2008 financial crisis.

Some classes of Fannie and Freddie’s preferred shares fell as much as 5 percent Tuesday, while the companies’ common shares rose about 4 percent as of 9:50 a.m. in New York.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac don’t lend money to home buyers. Instead, they provide housing-market liquidity by buying mortgages, then bundling them into securities on which they guarantee payments of principal and interest.

Share Reaction

The appeals court ruling from last year said a 2008 law barred federal judges from hearing most shareholder claims over the companies’ bailout. The law created the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which became the conservator of the two companies and was largely insulated from legal claims. The ruling said the funds could pursue some contract-based claims before a federal judge in Washington.

In addition to those contract-based claims, the hedge funds and other investors have several cases ongoing around the U.S. though most of them are still in early stages. The funds have been allowed limited discovery in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims and they say the discovery shows the government lied when it decided to sweep Fannie’s and Freddie’s profits. However, no court has yet said that the government’s motives even matter, and the only courts to rule so far have dismissed the cases.

‘Illegal Nationalization’

“Although we are disappointed by the court’s order today, we remain confident that we will ultimately prevail in reversing the illegal nationalization of Fannie and Freddie,” said David Thompson, an attorney for Cooper & Kirk who represents Fairholme and other investors.

Attorneys for Perry Capital and the class plaintiffs didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. A Justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment.

The net worth sweep, in place since January 2013, let the U.S. recoup even more than the $187 billion in taxpayer money it spent to stave off collapses of Fannie and Freddie. The hedge funds say the government has seized $130 billion more than it was entitled to.

The cases are Cacciapalle v. Federal Housing Finance Agency, 17-578; Perry Capital v. Federal Housing Finance Agency, 17-580; and Fairholme Funds v. Federal Housing Finance Agency, 17-591.

To contact the reporters on this story: Greg Stohr in Washington at [email protected]; Joe Light in Washington at [email protected] To contact the editors responsible for this story: Joe Sobczyk at [email protected] Gregory Mott, Jesse Westbrook


© 2018 Bloomberg L.P

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.